MH page 320

Those who live in new countries or in poverty-stricken districts, where fruits and nuts are scarce, should not be urged to exclude milk and eggs from their dietary. It is true that persons in full flesh and in whom the animal passions are strong need to avoid the use of stimulating foods. Especially in families of children who are given to sensual habits, eggs should not be used. But in the case of persons whose blood-making organs are feeble,—especially if other foods to supply the needed elements cannot be obtained,—milk and eggs should not be wholly discarded. Great care should be taken, however, to obtain milk from healthy cows, and eggs from healthy fowls, that are well fed and well cared for; and the eggs should be so cooked as to be most easily digested.

Dietary recommendations regarding milk and eggs should be adapted based on local resource scarcity, physical constitution, and health of animal sources. It makes empirical conditional claims about animal product consumption based on individual vigor, poverty, and animal health.

The diet reform should be progressive. As disease in animals increases, the use of milk and eggs will become more and more unsafe. An effort should be made to supply their place with other things that are healthful and inexpensive. The people everywhere should be taught how to cook without milk and eggs, so far as possible, and yet have their food wholesome and palatable.

Diet reform should be progressive, adapting to increasing disease in animals by replacing animal products with wholesome, inexpensive alternatives. It asserts an empirical claim about animal disease increasing over time and rendering animal-derived foods unsafe.