"Chapter 5—Cain and Abel Tested This chapter is based on Genesis 4:1-15 . Cain and Abel, the sons of Adam, differed widely in character. Abel had a spirit of loyalty to God; he saw justice and mercy in the Creator's dealings with the fallen race, and gratefully accepted the hope of redemption. But Cain cherished feelings of rebellion, and murmured against God because of the curse pronounced upon the earth and upon the human race for Adam's sin. He permitted his mind to run in the same channel that led to Satan's fall—indulging the desire for self-exaltation and questioning the divine justice and authority. PP 71"
EGW's chapter is explicitly based on Genesis 4:1-15, retelling and interpreting the story of Cain and Abel. The passage highlights the differing characters and motivations of the two brothers, drawing out thematic parallels related to obedience, rebellion, and acceptance of God's plan.
"“By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain.” Hebrews 11:4 . Abel grasped the great principles of redemption. He saw himself a sinner, and he saw sin and its penalty, death, standing between his soul and communion with God. He brought the slain victim, the sacrificed life, thus acknowledging the claims of the law that had been transgressed. Through the shed blood he looked to the future sacrifice, Christ dying on the cross of Calvary; and trusting in the atonement that was there to be made, he had the witness that he was righteous, and his offering accepted. PP 72.3"
EGW's passage expands on the brief account in Genesis 4:4, providing an interpretation of Abel's offering and its acceptance by God. The theme of sacrifice and divine acceptance is central to both passages.
"the system of offerings which God had ordained. They knew that in these offerings they were to express faith in the Saviour whom the offerings typified, and at the same time to acknowledge their total dependence on Him for pardon; and they knew that by thus conforming to the divine plan for their redemption, they were giving proof of their obedience to the will of God. Without the shedding of blood there could be no remission of sin; and they were to show their faith in the blood of Christ as the promised atonement by offering the firstlings of the flock in sacrifice. Besides this, the first fruits of the earth were to be presented before the Lord as a thank offering. PP 71.2"
EGW mentions the offering of the firstlings of the flock, which is exemplified by Abel's offering in Genesis 4:4. While not a direct quote, the connection is thematic and illustrates the practice of offering sacrifices.
"When Cain saw that his offering was rejected, he was angry with the Lord and with Abel; he was angry that God did not accept man's substitute in place of the sacrifice divinely ordained, and angry with his brother for choosing to obey God instead of joining in rebellion against Him. Notwithstanding Cain's disregard of the divine command, God did not leave him to himself; but He condescended to reason with the man who had shown himself so unreasonable. And the Lord said unto Cain, “Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?” Through an angel messenger the divine warning was conveyed: “If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? And if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door.” The choice lay with Cain himself. If he would trust to the merits of the promised Saviour, and would obey God's requirements, he would enjoy His favor. But should he persist in unbelief and transgression, he would have no ground for complaint because he was rejected by the Lord. PP 73.3"
The EGW passage refers directly to the events described in Genesis 4:5, and elaborates on the context and emotions involved. It's a direct reference and expansion.
"The schemes of the Babel builders ended in shame and defeat. The monument to their pride became the memorial of their folly. Yet men are continually pursuing the same course—depending upon self, and rejecting God's law. It is the principle that Satan tried to carry out in heaven; the same that governed Cain in presenting his offering. PP 123.3"
Both passages connect human actions (Cain's offering, the Tower of Babel) with a rejection of God's will and a reliance on self. The EGW passage explicitly draws the parallel, making the connection strong.
"When Cain saw that his offering was rejected, he was angry with the Lord and with Abel; he was angry that God did not accept man's substitute in place of the sacrifice divinely ordained, and angry with his brother for choosing to obey God instead of joining in rebellion against Him. Notwithstanding Cain's disregard of the divine command, God did not leave him to himself; but He condescended to reason with the man who had shown himself so unreasonable. And the Lord said unto Cain, “Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?” Through an angel messenger the divine warning was conveyed: “If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? And if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door.” The choice lay with Cain himself. If he would trust to the merits of the promised Saviour, and would obey God's requirements, he would enjoy His favor. But should he persist in unbelief and transgression, he would have no ground for complaint because he was rejected by the Lord. PP 73.3"
The EGW passage directly quotes Genesis 4:6, making it a clear explicit allusion.
"Adam's life was one of sorrow, humility, and contrition. When he left Eden, the thought that he must die thrilled him with horror. He was first made acquainted with the reality of death in the human family when Cain, his first-born son, became the murderer of his brother. Filled with the keenest remorse for his own sin, and doubly bereaved in the death of Abel and the rejection of Cain, Adam was bowed down with anguish. He witnessed the wide-spreading corruption that was finally to cause the destruction of the world by a flood; and though the sentence of death pronounced upon him by his Maker had at first appeared terrible, yet after beholding for nearly a thousand years the results of sin, he felt that it was merciful in God to bring to an end a life of suffering and sorrow. PP 82.2"
The EGW passage directly references the event of Cain slaying Abel and connects it to Adam's sorrow and remorse. This is a clear thematic parallel, as the EGW passage elaborates on the emotional impact of the event described in Genesis 4:8.
"The very existence of this people, holding the faith of the ancient church, was a constant testimony to Rome's apostasy, and therefore excited the most bitter hatred and persecution. Their refusal to surrender the Scriptures was also an offense that Rome could not tolerate. She determined to blot them from the earth. Now began the most terrible crusades against God's people in their mountain homes. Inquisitors were put upon their track, and the scene of innocent Abel falling before the murderous Cain was often repeated. GC 76.2"
The EGW passage explicitly uses the Cain and Abel story as a parallel to the persecution of God's people by Rome. The reference to Abel's murder by Cain directly illustrates the violence and injustice inflicted upon the faithful.
"God has been displeased with Sabbathkeepers for their avaricious spirit. Their desire to get gain is so strong that they have taken advantage of poor, unfortunate brethren in their distress and have added to their own already abundant means, while these poorer brethren have suffered for the same means. “Am I my brother's keeper?” is the language of their hearts. 1T 535.1"
EGW directly quotes the phrase "Am I my brother's keeper?" and applies it to a similar situation of neglecting responsibility for fellow believers.
"Cain the murderer was soon called to answer for his crime. “The Lord said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper?” Cain had gone so far in sin that he had lost a sense of the continual presence of God and of His greatness and omniscience. So he resorted to falsehood to conceal his guilt. PP 77.2"
This is a direct quote from Genesis 4:9, making it a clear and explicit allusion.
"“Am I my brother's keeper?” Said the angel: “Yea, thou art thy brother's keeper. Thou shouldest have a watchful care for thy brother, be interested for his welfare, and cherish a kind, loving spirit toward him. Press together, press together.” God designed that man should be openhearted and honest, without affectation, meek, humble, with simplicity. This is the principle of heaven; God ordered it so. But poor, frail man has sought out something different—to follow his own way, and carefully attend to his own self-interest. 1T 113.3"
EGW directly quotes and responds to Cain's question, making it an explicit allusion.
Fatherless and motherless children are thrown into the arms of the church, and Christ says to His followers: Take these destitute children, bring them up for Me, and ye shall receive your wages. I have seen much selfishness exhibited in these things. Unless there is some special evidence that they themselves are to be benefited by adopting into their family those who need homes, some turn away and answer: No. They do not seem to know or care whether such are saved or lost. That, they think, is not their business. With Cain they say: “Am I my brother's keeper?” They are not willing to be put to inconvenience or to make any sacrifice for the orphans, and they indifferently thrust such ones into the arms of the world, who are sometimes more willing to receive them than are these professed Christians. In the day of God, inquiry will be made for those whom Heaven gave them the opportunity of saving. But they wished to be excused, and would not engage in the good work unless they could make …
EGW directly quotes and applies the Cain and Abel story to the situation of neglecting orphans.
"Many have indulged in needless expense, merely to gratify the feelings, the taste, and the eye, when the cause needed the very means thus used, and when some of the servants of God were poorly clothed and were crippled in their labor for lack of means. Said the angel: “Their time to do will soon be past. Their works show that self is their idol, and to it they sacrifice.” Self must first be gratified; their feeling is: “Am I my brother's keeper?” Warning after warning many have received, but heeded not. Self is the main object, and to it everything must bow. 1T 115.1"
EGW directly quotes the phrase "Am I my brother's keeper?" from Genesis 4:9, making this an explicit allusion. The context in EGW's writing reinforces the selfish attitude reflected in Cain's question.
"True, noble, disinterested benevolence is too rarely found among the wealthy. In their ambition for wealth they overlook the claims of humanity. They cannot see and feel the cramped, disagreeable position of their brethren in poverty, who perhaps have labored as hard as themselves. Like Cain they say: “Am I my brother's keeper?” “I have worked hard for what I have; I must hold on to it.” Instead of praying, “Help me to feel my brother's woe,” their constant study is to forget that he has any woes, any claims upon their sympathy or liberalities. 1T 480.1"
EGW directly quotes the phrase 'Am I my brother's keeper?' and explicitly connects it to the attitude of the wealthy who neglect the needs of the poor, just as Cain denied responsibility for Abel.
"N umber One—Testimony for the Church Chapter 15—Thy Brother's Keeper 1T 113 November 20, 1855, while in prayer, the Spirit of the Lord came suddenly and powerfully upon me, and I was taken off in vision. 1T 113"
The title of the chapter in EGW's writing, 'Thy Brother's Keeper,' is a direct reference to Genesis 4:9. The EGW passage likely expands on the concept of responsibility for others, drawing directly from the biblical narrative.
"Again the Lord said to Cain, “What hast thou done? The voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto Me from the ground.” God had given Cain an opportunity to confess his sin. He had had time to reflect. He knew the enormity of the deed he had done, and of the falsehood he had uttered to conceal it; but he was rebellious still, and sentence was no longer deferred. The divine voice that had been heard in entreaty and admonition pronounced the terrible words: “And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand. When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.” PP 77.3"
The EGW passage directly quotes and elaborates on Genesis 4:10, recounting God's confrontation with Cain after he killed Abel.
"But above the tribunal of the church is the tribunal of God. He who declared to the first murderer, “The voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto Me from the ground” ( Genesis 4:10 ), will not accept for His altar the gifts of the liquor dealer. His anger is kindled against those who attempt to cover their guilt with a cloak of liberality. Their money is stained with blood. A curse is upon it. MH 340.2"
EGW directly quotes Genesis 4:10, "The voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto Me from the ground," and applies it to the liquor dealer, drawing a parallel between the sin of murder and the harm caused by the liquor trade.
"The scribes and Pharisees who listened to Jesus knew that His words were true. They knew how the prophet Zacharias had been slain. While the words of warning from God were upon his lips, a satanic fury seized the apostate king, and at his command the prophet was put to death. His blood had imprinted itself upon the very stones of the temple court, and could not be erased; it remained to bear testimony against apostate Israel. As long as the temple should stand, there would be the stain of that righteous blood, crying to God to be avenged. As Jesus referred to these fearful sins, a thrill of horror ran through the multitude. DA 619.2"
EGW connects the blood of Zacharias with the concept of blood crying out for vengeance, similar to Abel's blood in Genesis 4:10. The connection is thematic and not a direct quote, but the underlying principle is the same.
"It was not only because of the scene before Him that Christ wept. The weight of the grief of ages was upon Him. He saw the terrible effects of the transgression of God's law. He saw that in the history of the world, beginning with the death of Abel, the conflict between good and evil had been unceasing. Looking down the years to come, He saw the suffering and sorrow, tears and death, that were to be the lot of men. His heart was pierced with the pain of the human family of all ages and in all lands. The woes of the sinful race were heavy upon His soul, and the fountain of His tears was broken up as He longed to relieve all their distress. DA 534.2"
Both passages deal with the consequences of sin and its impact on humanity. Genesis 4:10 marks the beginning of violence and injustice, while the EGW passage reflects on the cumulative grief and suffering caused by sin throughout history. The connection is thematic, focusing on the weight of sin's consequences.
Upon receiving the curse of God, Cain had withdrawn from his father's household. He had first chosen his occupation as a tiller of the soil, and he now founded a city, calling it after the name of his eldest son. He had gone out from the presence of the Lord, cast away the promise of the restored Eden, to seek his possessions and enjoyment in the earth under the curse of sin, thus standing at the head of that great class of men who worship the god of this world. In that which pertains to mere earthly and material progress, his descendants became distinguished. But they were regardless of God, and in opposition to His purposes for man. To the crime of murder, in which Cain had led the way, Lamech, the fifth in descent, added polygamy, and, boastfully defiant, he acknowledged God, only to draw from the avenging of Cain an assurance of his own safety. Abel had led a pastoral life, dwelling in tents or booths, and the descendants of Seth followed the same course, counting themselves “stran…
EGW directly references Cain's departure from the presence of the Lord and his dwelling in the land of Nod, which is explicitly stated in Genesis 4:16. She then builds upon this verse to describe Cain's subsequent actions and the development of his lineage.
"The education centering in the family was that which prevailed in the days of the patriarchs. For the schools thus established, God provided the conditions most favorable for the development of character. The people who were under His direction still pursued the plan of life that He had appointed in the beginning. Those who departed from God built for themselves cities, and, congregating in them, gloried in the splendor, the luxury, and the vice that make the cities of today the world's pride and its curse. But the men who held fast God's principles of life dwelt among the fields and hills. They were tillers of the soil and keepers of flocks and herds, and in this free, independent life, with its opportunities for labor and study and meditation, they learned of God and taught their children of His works and ways. Ed 33.3"
EGW contrasts those who follow God's principles with those who build cities and embrace vice. This echoes the story of Cain building a city after departing from God's presence. The connection is thematic, highlighting the consequences of straying from God.
Chapter 6—Seth and Enoch This chapter is based on Genesis 4:25 to 6:2 . To Adam was given another son, to be the inheritor of the divine promise, the heir of the spiritual birthright. The name Seth, given to this son, signified “appointed,” or “compensation;” “for,” said the mother, “God hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.” Seth was of more noble stature than Cain or Abel, and resembled Adam more closely than did his other sons. He was a worthy character, following in the steps of Abel. Yet he inherited no more natural goodness than did Cain. Concerning the creation of Adam it is said, “In the likeness of God made He him;” but man, after the Fall, “begat a son in his own likeness, after his image.” While Adam was created sinless, in the likeness of God, Seth, like Cain, inherited the fallen nature of his parents. But he received also the knowledge of the Redeemer and instruction in righteousness. By divine grace he served and honored God; and he labored, as …
Ellen White directly references Genesis 4:25 in this passage.