Based on my search through Ellen White's writings, I found no evidence that Ellen White ever predicted or stated that Christ would come in 1915. In fact, her writings consistently warn against setting specific dates for Christ's second coming. Here's what Ellen White actually wrote about time-setting for Christ's coming: **Ellen White's Clear Position Against Time-Setting:** "Many who have called themselves Adventists have been time setters. Time after time has been set for Christ to come, but repeated failures have been the result. The definite time of our Lord's coming is declared to be beyond the ken of mortals" (4T 307.1). She was very explicit about this issue: "The repeated efforts to find new dates for the beginning and close of the prophetic periods, and the unsound reasoning necessary to sustain these positions, not only lead minds away from the present truth, but throw contempt upon all efforts to explain the prophecies. The more frequently a definite time is set for the second advent, and the more widely it is taught, the better it suits the purposes of Satan" (GC 457.1). **Her Personal Testimony:** Ellen White specifically addressed false accusations about her setting dates: "Some ministers claiming to be well acquainted with me, make the statement that I have often set the time for the Lord to come, and those times have passed; therefore my visions are false. Such false statements are no doubt received by many as truth. Those who know me and are acquainted with my labors will make no such report in candor" (1T 72.3). She testified: "This is the testimony I have borne ever since the passing of the time in 1844: 'Time after time will be set by different ones, which will pass by; and the influence of this time-setting will be to destroy the faith of God's people'" (1T 72.3). **What She Did Say About Christ's Coming:** While Ellen White never set a specific date like 1915, she did emphasize the nearness of Christ's return: "The coming of Christ is nearer than when we first believed" (8T 252.2) and "The return of Christ to our world will not be long delayed. Let this be the keynote of every message" (6T 406.1). There is no record in Ellen White's writings of any prediction that Christ would come in 1915. Such a claim would contradict her consistent position against time-setting throughout her ministry.

Ellen White's perspective on the 1844 disappointment was quite different from calling it a "false date." According to her writings, the date calculation was correct, but the understanding of what would happen on that date was mistaken. **Ellen White's Position on October 22, 1844:** Ellen White consistently maintained that the prophetic calculation placing the end of the 2300 days in autumn 1844 was accurate: "The computation of the prophetic periods on which that message was based, placing the close of the 2300 days in the autumn of 1844, stands without impeachment" (GC 457.1). She explained that the error was not in the date, but in the understanding of the event: "Mr. Miller and those who were in union with him supposed that the cleansing of the sanctuary spoken of in Daniel 8:14 meant the purifying of the earth by fire prior to its becoming the abode of the saints. This was to take place at the advent of Christ; therefore we looked for that event at the end of the 2300 days, or years. But after our disappointment the Scriptures were carefully searched with prayer and earnest thought, and after a period of suspense, light poured in upon our darkness; doubt and uncertainty were swept away" (1T 58.2). **The Nature of the Disappointment:** Ellen White described the experience: "But the appointed time had passed, and the Lord had not appeared. The believers knew that God's word could not fail; their interpretation of the prophecy must be at fault; but where was the mistake?" (GC 409.2). She emphasized that the disappointment served God's purposes: "The preaching of a definite time for the judgment, in the giving of the first message, was ordered by God" (GC 457.1). **Ellen White's Warning Against Future Time-Setting:** Following 1844, Ellen White became a strong opponent of setting any future dates: "Many who have called themselves Adventists have been time setters. Time after time has been set for Christ to come, but repeated failures have been the result. The definite time of our Lord's coming is declared to be beyond the ken of mortals" (4T 307.1). She testified: "This is the testimony I have borne ever since the passing of the time in 1844: 'Time after time will be set by different ones, which will pass by; and the influence of this time-setting will be to destroy the faith of God's people'" (1T 72.3). **The Correct Understanding:** According to Ellen White, what actually began on October 22, 1844, was Christ's ministry in the Most Holy Place of the heavenly sanctuary - the investigative judgment - rather than His second coming to earth. The date was prophetically significant, but the event was different from what the Millerites expected. So while 1844 brought disappointment regarding Christ's second coming, Ellen White never considered the date itself to be "false" - rather, she saw it as marking the beginning of a crucial phase in salvation history that the early Adventists had not previously understood.